Greenhouse Gas Theory Discredited by ‘Coolant’ Carbon Dioxide

By: John O’Sullivan

Science professor, a former global warming believer now denier, publishes groundbreaking paper to prove carbon dioxide cools, not warms our atmosphere.

Professor Nasif Nahle found something deeply troubling about the man-made global warming theory (AGW). He explains, “I started out wanting to debunk those deniers of science.”

Nahle had originally believed that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) were warming the atmosphere until he found an incorrect assumption on the Greenhouse Effect hypothesis.

Invited to attend a televised debate on the Indonesian Tsunami that addressed whether global warming was a factor in that catastrophe, Nahle checked the validity of calculations into the so-called greenhouse effect. “That was when I saw it was junk science.”

Nahle, from the Autonomous University of Nuevo León in Monterrey, N. L., Mexico, has worked professionally as a scientist for over 40 years. His findings are set to add more fuel to the fire in the vigorous debate over the validity of a cornerstone of the science of environmental activism.

In his new paper, ‘Determination of the Total Emissivity of a Mixture of Gases Containing 5% of Water Vapor and 0.039% of Carbon Dioxide at Overlapping Absorption Bands’ the Mexican biologist turned climate researcher proves that in nature, CO2 and water vapor mix together to decrease infrared radiation emissions/absorptions in the air. This is the opposite of what conventional climatology has been saying years.

You can read the rest of the article at the link below.

Source: Suite 101


Filed under Climate Alarmism, Climate Change, Climate Disruption, CO2, Co2 Insanity, Global Warming, John O'Sullivan

11 responses to “Greenhouse Gas Theory Discredited by ‘Coolant’ Carbon Dioxide

  1. Jerry

    The “source” reference does not work. Hope you fix that.

  2. Ralph

    You can find this on Youtube. Why do a big scientific experiment?

    AGW Debunked for £5.00

  3. spawn44

    The belief by the environmental socialists that CO2 was the driver behind their AGW push was purely political. It never had any real scientific basis . Thus the theory’s total collaspe after the release of the climategate emails exposed the fraud behind it’s promotion.


    All you have to know is that Global Warming was being used to create a worldwide, artificial trading market that wealthy investors could profit from and national governments could use to impose harsh regulations on smaller countries. Does anyone not get that the whole thing was about money? Do not fret, Barack Obama and Al Gore sold their PERSONAL investment in the CCX Chicago Climate Exchange to private investors from a the largest privately-held energy company you-never-heard-of that bankrolled Enron. So next time they try to defraud you at least they will be Republicans.

    • Mr. Mowers:

      I agree with almost all of what you wrote,…except this one thing;
      …… “the whole thing was about money?”,….sorry, in terms of the “whole scam”,…in my opinion, not the “whole thing” was about the bucks……

      I think the larger part of the “whole thing” is global control, with the end-game producing much “wealth” and dynastic leadership,….so I wonder?

      If the globalists planned on using the “co2 causes global warming” meme, but have been thwarted due to obviously dropping world-wide-temps, the disclosure of the “warming communications”, and the general dis-belief of most everyone on the planet,….

      …..perhaps the revised plan (bowing to solar influence, so to speak)…
      …perhaps the new plan is to go with the cooling flow,…anticipate the coming ice-age,…and now claim that “global cooling” is due to human production of carbon,..?

      I mean, it isn’t like they care about the “outcome” they decry,…they just need the “issue” to decry, and then remain committed to the “carbon output” thing. The folks trying to pull the strings of the world-wide Pinnochio Population decided a long time ago that carbon was their vehicle to world-wide taxation, world-wide domination and then, world-wide exploitation of everyone else’s resources, while continuing to shrink the world’s population. Then of course, the real riches will begin to flow,…

      They know that “carbon” will never be eliminated, so as long as they can tax it and justify it’s use as a tax base, it doesn’t matter what they say it “does”. Thirty years from now, as the planet continues to cool under the intelligently scientific anticipation of reduced sun-spots, and we legitimately cool all across the globe, how many will recall passionately about the prior claims of “warming”?

      We know that when we reach this point, the Carbon Taxers will claim prior use of the phrase,… “climate change”,…not, “global warming”, and then go on blandly explaining how carbon output causes “global cooling”,….

      …mark my words, as sure as ship, this will happen.

      So, perhaps the scientist mentioned in this article is the real-deal,..but if I was trying to re-lay the foundation for “global cooling” caused by those evil, yet taxable carbon units,….this is how I’d begin,….


      RJ O’Guillory
      Webster Groves-The Life of an Insane Family

  5. Harri Haanpää

    Lots of formulas. Can someone explain the gist of the argument in a nutshell? Where has this work been published?

  6. Chris

    “The belief by the environmental socialists that CO2 was the driver behind their AGW push was purely political.”

    Using the word, “socialists” instead of the more appropriate, “fascists” shows that political propaganda is not just restricted to the man-made global warming promoters. Someone, or some group, is getting very afraid of the rise of socialism in this era of mass unemployment and Wall Street criminality. I see this deliberate misuse of the word “socialist” all over the internet.

  7. per

    With a coming sun/cosmic caused ice age, what else can the “scientists” say now?

    At least: it’s evil CO2 and the evil breathing humans! (And do not talk about the sun!)

  8. Anonymous

    The correct link is probably this:

    Click to access ECO2.pdf

    or this:

    or this

    Click to access NNS-Recycling_of_Heat_in_the_Atmosphere.pdf

    Nahle has apparently been making various versions of this paper.