Category Archives: Ecoterror

Meet the Dr. Kervorkian of Climate Change

WHICH ONE'S THE NICE GUY?

Actually even Dr. Kevorkian would probably be appalled at this dude. He might even make Joseph Mengele puke. Hint – the guy on the right is the one who who wants climate deniers sent to gulags and encourages mass killings as a final solution to non-existent anthropogenic global warming.

Meet Pentti Linkola, an extremely sick mind who according to this article from Prison Planet sounds like he never met a Nazi he didn’t like. Linkola advocates the following…..

  • re-educate deniers in gulags
  • kill the majority of humans/eradicate 10’s of millions of people
  • enslave the rest
  • wants a green police state
  • forcible sterilization
  • cars confiscated
  • travel restricted to the elite (obviously this asshole thinks he is one of them)
  • forced abortions
  • licenses for birth
  • tight regulation of electric power
  • forcing humans to have arat du jour diet
  • terminate businesses

Of course none of the above will affect the élite, who he considers himself to be one of. Sounds like a really “nice” guy doesn’t he?

Philosopher Pentti Linkola has built an enthusiastic following of self-described “eco-fascists” receptive to his message that the state should enact draconian measures of “discipline, prohibition, enforcement and oppression” in order to make people comply with environmental dictates.

Linkola’s barbaric and dictatorial philosophy has remained relatively obscure but is now gaining traction as the mask of environmentalism is lifted to unveil its true nature – a justification for 21st century tyranny on a grand scale, characterized by eugenics, sterilization, gulags, police states, and total government control over every aspect of our existence.

I don’t think Adolph Hitler or Joseph Stalin were even this ambitious. Either might have hired him. It doesn’t stop with him, though.  There are other’s running about like him. Who else?

Turns out that we also have our own advocate of mass genocide right here in the United States. Where? Right in the Whitehouse, that’s where!

The current White House science czar John P. Holdren also advocates the most obscenely dictatorial, eco-fascist, and inhumane practices in the name of environmentalism. In his 1977 Ecoscience textbook, Holdren calls for a “planetary regime” to carry out forced abortions and mandatory sterilization procedures, as well as drugging the water supply, in an effort to cull the human surplus.

Must be some of that hope and change all the libtard lemmings voted for. Yes, our president is such a nice guy he hires a Malthusian moron and puts him our government as a White House Czar. That should tell you all you need to know about Obama.  A sitting president shouldn’t be socializing or employing people like this. Hell, a normal human being wouldn’t associate with Holdren or Linkola. Yet the chosen one gets away with it and gets accolades to boot. You can read more about Holdren and his shenanigans here in this article at The Resilient Earth.

I would offer the Doctor Kevorkian of climate change and his buddies a suggestion. Why don’t you back up your bullshit and all kill yourselves as you’re all a part of the problem. Perhaps you should set an example for the rest of us? I doubt many will want to follow, including yourselves and your “people.” After all, stuff like this is only acceptable when it applies to other people isn’t it?

If you don’t have the balls to do that then perhaps you should start eating “Rat – it’s whats for dinner” or “Rat – the other white meat.”

This is what I’d term to be Mega CO2 Insanity. You can read all about this asshole at the source link below.

Source: Prison Planet

Comments Off on Meet the Dr. Kervorkian of Climate Change

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming, Government, Terrorist

Help save an Aussie farm family & stop green tyranny!

Help these people the have kids and dreams like the rest of us!

VERY URGENT! PLEASE READ! PLEASE HELP WITH A DONATION!

From the Watts Up With That? website comes an urgent call to help save an Aussie farm family who have been screwed-over by the greentards and the Australian government. I would take donating up to another level and send the government e-mails explaining to them that you will not be spending any tourist dollars in Australia until crap like this stops. I’m making a PayPal donation and when I find some greentard government officials to e-mail, I will be sending them some terse comments.  Thanks for helping stop the greentard tyrrany!  This is urgent they only have 4 days until they’re evicted. Please help!

WUWT readers may recall this story: Death of a Feedlot Operator

In which the anal-retentive government of West Australia has “licensed” a family farm out of operation due to some phony science and arbitrary application of the “sniff test”. Yes that’s right, cattle farms smell, so do pig farms, as does any farm. But now it’s reason to shut one out due to baseless complaints from the local greens. And, it all started when Matt Thompson started doubting global warming and talking about it publicly.

I’ve never made a plea to the WUWT worldwide readership for help, I’m making one now to donate to these people to stave off eviction. If nothing else, do it to spite the government of Western Australia and the greens (Environmental Defender’s Office WA)  that have turned farming into a “crime”. The real crime is that government listens to these boneheads.

Source: Watts Up With That?

Link to article from JoNova website: http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/4-days-notice-the-thompsons-are-served-notice-of-eviction/

I would urge anyone with a website and a heart to post this up as fast as  you can. You could be the next victim of greentardism. Now I’m off to make a donation!

2 Comments

Filed under Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming, Government

“The Weather of the Future” Alarmist Book Review

This one makes me laugh. We now have a book titled “The Weather of the Future.” Picked up from the Washington Post review Page titled “Science Scan,” which in the case of some “warmer” scientist might be more accurately named “Science Scam.”

Based upon what their writeup on “The Weather of the Future” book it appears we may have yet another case of climate models being used meaning we might also have another case of prophecy by science.

I’ll wager that Nostradamus probably isn’t spinning in his grave worrying about the accuracy factor.  You know those crazy computer models.  Figure out the result you want then plug-in the data to ensure a successful prediction. Then write a  new scary book about how global warming is going to fricassee everyone.

I do find one line from the review probably best describes what this obvious attempt to get everyone to go “postal” over global warming is all about.

Cullen even foresees Xavier, a Category 4 hurricane, slamming into New York City in 2050. No climate model, no matter how sophisticated, could predict a hurricane that far in advance, so clearly Cullen is taking some creative license to make a point.

That’s pretty good premonition (or as I prefer to term it “bullshit”) to be seeing into mid-century, which is 40 years from now.  But I do think the reviewer has it right when she notes “creative license,” (another euphemism for “bullshit”). I mean she even named it! Looks like Jean Dixon might have some competition.

With all the alarmism of late giving us results like James J. Lee’s Ecoterror Jihad against the Discovery Channel HQ, one has to start to wonder what other ecoterror crimes the recent wave of “Alarmist Whackjonism” may cause.

There is one thing the author of the review didn’t tell us that “enquiring minds” may want to know want to know. Will this be filed in the “science” section at the library or the “fiction” section?

You can see Heidi Cullen in action in the below video from YouTube of the Larry King show to see her in action. This is in 2007 just before the IPCC released its last report.

Dr. Cullen also seems like perhaps she has a little NAZI in her blood as evidenced by her quote below, taken from the Weather Channel 12/21/06 (here), that I feel is tantamount to advocating that the opposition be not only silenced but punished,  if they dare disagree with anthropogenic global warming.

If a meteorologist can’t speak to the fundamental science of climate change, then maybe the AMS shouldn’t give them a Seal of Approval.

What next Heidi, perhaps advocating they go to a “gulag” for “re-education?”

You can decide what you think about Dr. Cullen and her book yourself.

Source: Science Scan/Washington Post

Comments Off on “The Weather of the Future” Alarmist Book Review

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Eco Jihad, Ecoterror, Global Warming, Weather

Alarmist Whackjobism Continues?

Per info in the article this cut in the Amazon rainforest will be replaced 50 times by new growth

We have a new study that appears to be another instance of  what I call “alarmist whackjobism.” It only bolsters my impression that the “warmers” are in desperation mode and are posting some rather amazing things. Things that have the appearance of being designed to bolster their failing arguments regarding anthropogenic global warming. Things designed perhaps to give the governments of the world motivation to pass carbon taxes, cap-and-trade laws and reign in all things that emit carbon. Things that could potentially create a new Unibomber or a new James J. Lee. This time it’s about the tropical rainforests (again).

Allheadlinenews.com has this article titled “New Farmlands Driving Out Forests Causes Climate Change Study Says.” It cites what is in my opinion an alarmist study (citation here) posted on the PNAS website (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America) that “conveniently” points out that those nefarious tropical farmers are cutting down those trees (the warmers so love to hug) by the millions, and that the process is (of course), going to increase CO2 (which we’re still supposed to believe increases global warming in spite of much damning evidence to the contrary). You can take the following statement into consideration.

More than half a million square miles of new farmland created in tropical countries, such as Brazil and Indonesia, between 1980 to 2000 was due to the felling of forests which in turn, accelerated the release of carbon into the atmosphere resulting in global warming, according to a new study led by Stanford postdoctoral researcher, Holly Gibbs, of the Department of Environmental Earth System Science.

Go ahead, read it again, look at the dates: “between 1980 to 2000.” That seems to be a “conveniently” dated report. Possibly “conveniently” dated because there’s nothing going on after 2000 to get excited about. You call it, I’m just pointing it out for you to think about.

The abstract at PNAS makes me wonder if there wasn’t some “convenient” timing there?  If you read the fine print you can see this study was submitted on September 22, 2009 and not approved until July 30, 2010. That’s a little over 10 months and a lot of negative things about global warming have happened since 9/22/09 such as Climategate, the IPCC getting sat on by the IAC, the Hockeystick graph, myriad problems with the MET, NOAA, NASA, GISS, Satellitegate and many other issues that appear to have increased the warmer desperation level faster than NOAA or GISS can alter temperature data.

I almost wonder if this wasn’t pulled out of the round file due to the increasing need to counter-attack the skeptics with anything they can muster. Like the saying goes “desperate times call for desperate measures,” which could be the new “warmer” mantra.

Why do I take umbrage at this? First, let us look at the definition of umbrage, which is why I chose that word as it seems to have a good take on the “warmer” claims made in this study about rainforests. From here at Dictionary.com we get the following:

“um·brage

[uhm-brij]  Show IPA

–noun

1. offense; annoyance; displeasure: to feel umbrage at a socialsnub; to give

umbrage to someone; to take umbrage at someone’s rudeness.

2. the slightest indication or vaguest feeling of suspicion, doubt,hostility, or

the like.

3. leaves that afford shade, as the foliage of tree

4. shade or shadows, as cast by trees.

5. a shadowy appearance or semblance of something.”

Sorry if you don’t get it but since we’re talking about rainforests I thought the definitions were funny, and yes, words such as offense; annoyance; and displeasure could describe my feelings about what I question is going on with this report (to say the least).

There is a reason I take umbrage, which takes us back to the date of the report. My suspicion is that they don’t have much to stir people up with after 2000, so they cut things “conveniently” off  at 2000. It appears that after 2000 we have things popping up that present problems with the claims in this report such as:

From Mongabay we get the following about the Amazon Jungle.

Annual deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell below 10,000 square kilometers for the first time since record-keeping began, reported Brazil’s Environment Minister Carlos Minc on Sunday.

You can read the whole article here. Please note that it’s dated June 22, 2009, about 8.5 years after the 2000 cutoff date cited in the study. Also please note the remark at the end about how the Brazilian government committing to significant reductions in deforestation of the Amazon Jungle, which is an indication the deforestation will slow down and possibly stop in much of the Amazon. Something not mentioned this report even though recently published.

Want more to ponder? You can read this from a New York Times article here circa June 29, 2009, again long after this studies cutoff date of 2000.

By one estimate, for every acre of rain forest cut down each year, more than 50 acres of new forest are growing in the tropics on land that was once farmed, logged or ravaged by natural disaster.

The new forests, the scientists argue, could blunt the effects of rain forest destruction by absorbing carbon dioxide, the leading heat-trapping gas linked to global warming, one crucial role that rain forests play.

Well now, isn’t that amazingly contrary to the report that prompted this post? Rainforest’s growing? Heaven forbid! This could be another reason we get the cutoff date of 2000. Again from the same NYT article.

The idea has stirred outrage among environmentalists who believe that vigorous efforts to protect native rain forest should remain a top priority. But the notion has gained currency in mainstream organizations like the Smithsonian Institution and the United Nations, which in 2005 concluded that new forests were “increasing dramatically” and “undervalued” for their environmental benefits. The United Nations is undertaking the first global catalog of the new forests, which vary greatly in their stage of growth.

Even the United Nations (home of the IPPC and who in general seem to love all things warming) bought into the fact that the rainforest are growing back in 2005, about 5 years after the 2000 cutoff date in the Stanford report. Is environmental outrage perhaps some or all of the driving force behind this report? Is this another good reason for the 2000 cutoff date?

We get even more from CO2 Science’s article found here.

In a report published in the 6 March 2009 issue of Science, Oliver L. Phillips of the UK’s University of Leeds and his 65 co-authors write that “old growth forests in Amazonia … through photosynthesis and respiration … process 18 petagrams [18 x 1015 grams] of carbon annually,” which they say is “more than twice the rate of anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions.” They also state that over the past quarter-century of intensive region-wide measurements, the productivity of the Amazon rainforest — even in its extreme old age — has been found to be “increasing with time,” in support of which statement they cite the comprehensive observational studies of Phillips et al. (1998), Nemani et al. (2003), Baker et al. (2004), Lewis et al. (2004) and Ichii et al. (2005).

So per the above the Amazon alone is processing more CO2 than we’re pumping out globally (2 x) and the ability to process CO2 is increasing, not decreasing as the report would have you believe.  This causes me to again wonder why the evident alarmism, what the motivation for this report was and why the seemingly “convenient” cutoff date of 2000? Note that the item from CO2 Science doesn’t even include the respiration of all the other forests and plants of all types worldwide, just the Amazon.

Think about this and tell me where’s the problem and why the alarmism? Is this more CO2 Insanity?

Source: Allheadlines.com

1 Comment

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming

Climate alarmist ABC busted

ABC's retraction of the article

In the continuing saga of how the non-stop bombardment of global warming BS by the climate alarmists are pushing people over the edge, some to the point of committing murder-suicide and making hostile takeovers of the Discovery Channel HQ in Maryland, we now get another falsehood that’s been busted.

Remember the headline flying around the warmer sites about how the melting snow and ice on Mount Everest was making it hard to climb? You can read ABC’s take down of the article here and the original BBC article that ABC used here.

Is Mount Everest melting? Evidently no one can find a credible source regarding this article. You can thank ABC News Watch and read about the whole dirty deal at the source below.

I’ll offer my sincere thanks to them for busting more warmer bull schiessen. Now I wonder if they can get the BBC to back down, too?

Shame on major news organizations like this publishing falsehoods! More CO2 Insanity.

Source: ABC News Watch

Comments Off on Climate alarmist ABC busted

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Glaciers, Global Warming

Hurricane Alarmism

Hurricane Earl Subject of Alarmism

This is the kind of garbage that gets people stirred up over little or nothing. The warmistas need to tone it down some lest we have more John Lees (ecoterrorist invader of the Discovery Channel Building in Silver Spring, Maryland) and Ted Kaczynskis (the Unibomber) running around blowing up or shooting people who are skeptical about anthropogenic global warming. You would think someone would get a clue, but no, we get more alarmist claptrap courtesy of this article from Boston.com’s “The Green Blog.” To quote…..

The large waves, storm surge, and flooding that Hurricane Earl will spawn as it strikes Massachusetts tomorrow night comes with an added dollop of trouble; Sea level rise. Very gradual — and in some cases accelerating — rises in sea level off our coast over the last century will boost the height of Earl’s storm surge — expected to be one to four feet — meaning the wall of water will be able to travel that much farther inland and over higher elevations to flood basements, streets, and other low-lying areas.

Of course the article just had to lay the blame at our old “friend” global warming even though it is unproven BS. “Wall of water?” This isn’t going to be a 10 meter event in Massachusetts by any stretch of the imagination. As of now it’s like a 1-4 feet predicted storm surge being predicted. I guess “wall of water” increases the drama and alarmism.

Sea level is rising, scientists say, in large part because of a global warming double punch: higher ocean temperatures that expand the volume of water, and melting glaciers that add water to the sea. So future hurricanes are likely to cause more widespread flooding.

Now doesn’t “temperatures that expand the volume of water” sound ridiculous? Yes? No? I’m not refuting laws of physics, but think about it for a second, not as a reality but with respect to an ocean, not a glass of water. Has the whole entire Atlantic Ocean suddenly and completely warmed up from the Arctic to the Antarctic, from the US to Europe and from South America to Africa? I really think not. It would be rather asinine to claim that because it is constantly warming and cooling and doing it in different places at different times. Sea-levels will vary some, yes. Yet this article appears to try to get us to believe the whole Atlantic Ocean has warmed in its entirety and will be spilling over into the United States any second now and causing flooding in Des Moines, Iowa.

As an aside, water is also a little different animal than most things. Water will expand when heated, but guess what? It also will expand when cooling. Below is a quote from eHow about it or you can go here and see for yourself.

  • Water is not like other liquids. It isn’t, well, a normal liquid. In other liquids, the basic principle holds true that heated liquids expand and cooled liquids contract. But water doesn’t exactly work the same way. Water does expand when heated and contracts when cooled, but not at all temperature levels.
  • Water has a magic range where the rules do not apply. The main reason for this difference is its makeup. Water is made up of hydrogen and oxygen, and they exist as a loose bond. The range that is different is between 0 and 4 degrees Celsius (32 degrees F to 39.2 degrees F). Water at any other temperature would expand when it is heated, and contract when cooled.
  • However, at 4 degrees Celsius (39.2 F), water is at its most contracted state, but it isn’t frozen. It doesn’t freeze until zero degrees Celsius. This means as it goes toward 0 degrees it expands because of the crystallization of the water into ice. This stems from a reorganization of the oxygen and hydrogen bonds into stronger and more complex attachments. Because water at 0 degrees Celsius (32 F) is more expanded than at 4 degrees Celsius (39.2 F), water heated from zero degrees will shrink from its crystallized state until it makes it back to 4 degrees. Beyond 4 degrees, the water will start to expand again.
  • You can see per the below chart how much the ocean as risen since 1880, which is about 20 centimeters, which equals 7.87 inches, short of the claimed foot in Falmouth by a little over 4 inches, which really isn’t a big deal as far as I’m concerned, just noted so you can see what appears to be to be another exaggeration in a long line of global warming exaggerations, which goes along with the alarmism in the article. Realistically this is 120 years of graph which amounts to a whopping  0.o6558333333 inches of rise per year or approximately 2/3 of an inch per year.  Not much to be alarmed about is there? (Note: The graph was based on 23 different locations and certainly doesn’t span every drop of every ocean and this also is global and not just the Atlantic Ocean).

    "Image created by Robert A. Rohde / Global Warming Art"

    To get back on track here the reason I claim this is alarmism is that while the sea-level may be 8 inches or so higher than it was in 1880, (and yes, it’s close enough that we will go with the 1 foot claimed in the article to reduce any whining). What seems so ridiculous to me is that as of now, they’re predicting a 1 to 4 foot storm surge, which about renders that extra foot moot because regardless it’s going to spill over and cause some flooding. In the case of a hurricane Camille in 1969 the storm surge was 24.6 feet. Think the ocean being a foot or so higher is going to make any difference in a case like that? I think not anything that anyone would notice in the aftermath.

    So why the continued alarmism? Why does it appear the warmers will continue to keep stirring people up with suppositions and exaggerations? Do they want more John Lees? Do they want more Unibombers to come out of the woodwork and kill people?

    It smacks of more desperation from the warmer crowd and the mainstream media to me.  They’re losing the battle, they’re desperate, they’ll claim anything and everything is related to global warming, regardless how silly. They can’t keep exaggerating things like this and expect anyone who’s reasonable to believe it.  So what’s the point? Sell newspapers and magazines? Perhaps that some of it.

    Sometimes I think they really don’t want to win anyone over, they just want the lunatic fringe to believe in their postulating so they’ll arm themselves with guns or bombs and force everyone to do their bidding. Perhaps they’re really using the science of psychology to enforce their belief of anthropogenic global warming upon us.

    I can’t say for certain, perhaps you should ask people such as Al Gore and James Cameron about it.  James by the way seems to like the thought of ecoterrorism.  You can read about that here.

    Source: Boston.com

    Comments Off on Hurricane Alarmism

    Filed under Climategate, Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming, Weather

    Ecoterror jihad?

    Jame J. Lee - Ecoterrorist

    UPDATES AT BOTTOM OF PAGE

    It seems someone must have declared an ecoterror jihad. First we have warmers gluing themselves to banks, then we get Greenpeace trying  a hostile takeover of an oil drilling rig off the coast of Greenland and now we have a greentard gone mad taking over the Discovery Channel building. If there a full green cheese moon this month or something? Did someone declare an Ecoterror Jihad? Should Homeland Security be checking into the “Eco Taliban?”

    It appears to me that what we have going on here could be the forefront of a new wave of warmer desperation and despair because people are not falling for the anthropogenic global warming BS anymore. Are they getting so desperate that violence may become their main path to getting the world to genuflect to the Church of Global Warming? Think about it.

    We have Al Gore and others who have  admitted defeat on getting cap & trade passed this year in Congress. Obama appears to have stuck his head in the sand on this issue (not to mention others). The Chicago Climate Exchange (trading carbon credits) is imploding as we watch (along with Al Gore’s wallet). The UN has realized that the carbon trading scheme in Europe is about as corrupt as it gets with a $2.7 billion scam. The IPCC has been bitch-slapped by the IAC due to a lot of bad science, fraud, mismanagement and conflicts of interest surrounding their last report in 2007. The UN (justifiably) can’t get anyone to agree on much of anything about global warming or what to do or not to do about it, and the warmers appear to be losing it, perhaps big time.

    Today we hit a new low in ecoterror with James J. Lee arming himself and taking over the Discovery Channel building in Silver Spring, Maryland in a desperate effort to have the Discovery Channel do his bidding. You can read his manifesto below, taken from his website Save The Planet Protest.  I took a screenshot of this as I don’t expect that link will be working much longer.

    Manifesto From James Lee's Website

    This is a rather amazing set of demands.  We get demands and rantings such as:

    • “The Discovery Channel and it’s affiliate channels MUST have daily television programs at prime time slots based on Daniel Quinn’s “My Ishmael” pages 207-212 where solutions to save the planet would be done in the same way as the Industrial Revolution was done, by people building on each other’s inventive ideas.”
    • “Focus must be given on how people can live WITHOUT giving birth to more filthy human children since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution.”
    • “All programs on Discovery Health-TLC must stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants and the false heroics behind those actions the same way as the Industrial Revolution was done, by people building on each other’s inventive ideas.”
    • “All programs promoting War and the technology behind those must cease. (Talk about hypocritical thinking).”
    • “Civilization must be exposed for the filth it is.”
    • “Programs must be developed to find solutions to stopping ALL immigration pollution and the anchor baby filth that follows that.”
    • “Talk about Malthus and Darwin until it sinks into the stupid people’s brains until they get it!!”
    • “That means stopping the human race from breeding any more disgusting human babies!”
    • “Humans are the most destructive, filthy, pollutive creatures around and are wrecking what’s left of the planet with their false morals and breeding culture.”

    Obviously what we have here is a sick mind, perhaps the result of being bombarded with Green bullshit from various sources until he just couldn’t deal with it anymore and went off the deep end. Per CNN this could be a part of where the problem started…..

    n a 2006 MySpace posting, Lee wrote: “I finished reading the Daniel Quinn books last month. It started off just as a recommendation from a girl who worked at a coffeehouse.

    So who’s Daniel Quinn? Well you can go here and see the website Ishmael.org , see some of what he’s about, and judge for yourself. Obviously he’s an alarmist who likes stirring people like Lee up about things such as over-population, pollution and global warming. To quote from his biography on Wikipedia…..

    While response to Ishmael was mostly very positive, Quinn inspired a great deal of controversy with his claim (most explicitly discussed in the appendix section of The Story of B) that since population growth is a function of food supply, sustained food aid to impoverished nations merely puts off and dramatically worsens a massive population-environment crisis. This crisis is born of a disconnect between local humans and the local habitat with its food. Quinn points out that ending this disconnect is a proven way to avoid famines.

    I think that explains a lot about where Mr. Lee got some of the ideas put forth in his demands to Discovery Channel regarding overpopulation problems and issues he seems to have with human reproduction. Perhaps he wanted to end a few people’s “disconnect.”

    Is this the prototype ecoterrorist? Is this what organizations such as Greenpeace want running about? Ecoterrorst who will shoot or blow up people, companies and organizations who don’t follow their green dogma? Is this what people like Al Gore are creating?

    The reason I mention the above is that according to this article from AP…..

    At Lee’s trial, The Gazette of Montgomery County reported, Lee said he began working to save the planet after being laid off from his job in San Diego.

    He said he was inspired by “Ishmael,” a novel by environmentalist Daniel Quinn, and by former Vice President Al Gore’s documentary “An Inconvenient Truth.”

    Evidently watching some programs on the Discovery channel also helped create this mindset and his attack on the Discovery Channel itself…..

    “The Discovery Channel produces many so-called ‘Environmental Programs’ supposedly there to save the planet,” Lee said in an ad he took out in a Washington newspaper to promote the protest. “But the truth is things are getting WORSE! Their programs are causing more harm than good.”

    I’d bet programs like “Whale Wars” didn’t help his mindset either. It wouldn’t be a stretch to surmise this show may have given him some ideas about going on the attack against society. Kind of like monkey see, monkey do. Whaling ship or TV station, what’s the difference to someone like James Lee?

    One could also speculate as to whether things emanating from Greenpeace such as: “We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.” may have played into the mindset of this ecoterrorist.

    Of course, no one will be prosecuted for putting such thoughts into this man’s mind. Greenpeace will continue harassing whaling ships, Al Gore will perhaps continue harassing masseuses, etc. After all, it’s not their fault the got him so stirred up that he took over the Discovery Channel building and was killed by the police, now is it?

    I guess you could term this “Anthropogenic CO2 Insanity.” A term I hope we don’t start using with more frequency. I have to wonder if the “Eco Taliban” aren’t calling for “Eco Jihad” against innocent people. Time will tell.

    UPDATE – LEE’S MOVIE ON YOUTUBE

    UPDATE FROM CBS – LEE ARRESTED IN 2003 FOR HUMAN SMUGGLING AT MEXICAN BORDER

    Comments Off on Ecoterror jihad?

    Filed under Co2 Insanity, Eco Jihad, Ecoterror, Food, Global Warming, Immigration