Category Archives: Ecoterror

Meet the new global warming spokesperson?

I was kind of blown away this week by the above video showing climate skeptics/deniers being blown away because they don’t go along with the warmista view of things.

I was blown away a second time when Osama bin Laden announced he’s concerned about climate change and the victims.  Per Ecopolitology he’s quoted as saying…..

In a new tape posted to an Islamic forum on Friday, Al Qaeda leader and world public enemy #1 Osama bin Laden departs from his usual calls for death and destruction in order to lament the vast and damaging effects of climate change.

“The number of victims caused by climate change is very big,” says bin Laden (though officially the voice has yet to be verified as his). “Bigger than the victims of wars.” It may seem like the terrorist is softening in his old age, but analysts have been quick to suggest that this latest recording smacks of desperation: anything to recruit supporters and regain flagging support, and with tens of millions of Pakistanis affected by recent flooding, the timing certainly makes sense.

Realistically, this is the exact opposite of what you would expect from either party. I mean personally, I’d expect Osama Bin Laden to be the one blowing up human beings and the warmers to be the ones showing concern for people affected by alleged climate change (read weather) in Pakistan. Wouldn’t you?

So I am surprised none of the warmers have come forward to declare Osama bin Laden as Al Gore’s replacement as the new spokesperson for climate change. Actually I am wondering if this may not already be in the works.

Think about it.  We have the Obama Administration’s Malthusian Science Czar, John Holdren, wanting to change the new official name of climate change to climate disruption.  To me the word disruption kind of goes along nicely with blowing people up because they’re skeptics. If you take it one step further I wonder if he’s subliminally pushing for Osama bin Laden to be the new Global Disruption Czar?

Think about it. They’d have a certified warmer in charge who likes to blow up people. Talk about killing two birds with one stone!

If elected as the new spokesperson for climate disruption I promise ot blow up all skeptics and deniers!

OK warmers! I”m waiting for the announcement that Osama bin Laden is replacing Al Gore as global warming’s poster boy. He’s the perfect man to lead climate jihad.

In the meantime I think I’ll scour the internet for a surplus bomb-squad suit and some sand bags. Talk about CO2 Insanity.

3 Comments

Filed under Climate Change, Co2 Insanity, Eco Jihad, Ecoterror, Global Warming

Project DUMBo…emphasis on DUMB

In the previous post we can see how the sea-level went down in 2010. So what do I read a few minutes later? I read about Project Dumbo. No it’s not about a flying elephant! It’s a project about what New York City will look like when the sea-level rises and the East River overflows.  The only problem is that the dumbo that made Project Dumbo Underwater must be a dumbo who’s evidently clueless about the latest sea-level data. More climate alarmism. Must be the week to get more clueless people all stirred-up.  First we have a nice climate alarmist video that shows how these supposedly green and peace-loving warmers really conceal an urge to blow climate deniers to smithereens and now we get New York City underwater.

I hope some poor clueless person doesn’t see Project DUMB0 and go “postal” and take over the Discovery Channel headquarters again. Or, perhaps some greentard will decide it’s time to really start blowing people up ala Ted Kaczyksli.

You can watch the video below. Or go to the source link below the video to read the whole article.

Source: World Changing

1 Comment

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming, Sea-Level

Repugnant Climate Fascists Launch New Video Campaign by: John O’Sullivan

Note: I was going to put this up earlier today but the video conveniently disappeared from YouTube.  It’s back here but I can’t guarantee it won’t disappear again.  If it does I’ll try to find it again. Editor

New Low: Desperate Warmist Video Detonates Deniers into Dead Meat

UK cinemas see national release of ‘fun’ new climate activists campaign video showing killing of global warming deniers. Film marked with a parental advisory warning.

Touted in The Guardian newspaper the film labeled, “Not suitable for children” marks a new low in environmentalist cinematic propaganda. Announcing the film’s release the national newspaper boasts, “Our friends at the 10:10 climate change campaign have given us the scoop on this highly explosive short film, written by Britain’s top comedy screenwriter Richard Curtis, ahead of its general release.” (hat tip: Barry Woods).

Last Ditch Attempt in Failing Campaign

The offering is being dismissed as a lamentable a last ditch attempt to salvage something of the British government’s futile and soon redundant‘10:10 climate change campaign’ (an initiative to persuade Brits to cut 10% from their carbon emissions in 2010). Official figures show that UK household emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) increased bymore than 3% this year as domestic fuel use rose due to colder temperatures.

Guardian readers are invited to guffaw as role models and authority figures depicted in the film press a red button and detonate global warming ‘deniers’ into gory lumps of offal.  Packaged in the guise of humor this naked hard sell seems a pitiful attempt at convincing the ‘one or two’ of us who are still left that the sky really is falling despite no rising temperatures globally since 1998.

Gillian Anderson (X-Files) and Radiohead join the motley collection of B listers and has-been former soccer stars. Along with indifferent school kids and non-compliant office workers the naysayers all have their innards exploded. No doubt an enhanced 3-D high-definition sequel will be in the pipeline if the premier of this ‘offaling’ goeswell.  For your edification you can watch a nay-saying soccer player and movie star vaporize into gory pulp- all for ignoring their carbon footprint!

Bad Year for Hollywood’s Warmist Cinema

Sadly, 2010 is fast turning into a bad year for tree-hugging film makers. It started with so much promise with the general release of James ‘Chicken’ Cameron’s animated full length feature, ‘Avatar.’ But, Cameron, the new Hollywood darling of the warmist crazies, turned tail and ran after canceling at the very last minute after demanding a climate debate with prominent skeptic, Marc Morano of Climate Depot.

On this evidence, Curtis and Hamilton have so much in common: both appearing to be intellectually bankrupt yet filled by self-loathing as they mournfully concede that public interest in climate-related issues just walked off a cliff.

Setting the bar so low with its most simple (or should that be simplistic?) message, this mercifully short film, also showing on Youtube, is literally tripe and speaks more to the converted than non-believers. But as they say, all publicity is good, right?

Editor: More CO2 Insanity! I suppose if they were blowing up animals PETA  would be indignant. Blow up deniers? No problem!

1 Comment

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming, John O'Sullivan

Meet the Dr. Kervorkian of Climate Change

WHICH ONE'S THE NICE GUY?

Actually even Dr. Kevorkian would probably be appalled at this dude. He might even make Joseph Mengele puke. Hint – the guy on the right is the one who who wants climate deniers sent to gulags and encourages mass killings as a final solution to non-existent anthropogenic global warming.

Meet Pentti Linkola, an extremely sick mind who according to this article from Prison Planet sounds like he never met a Nazi he didn’t like. Linkola advocates the following…..

  • re-educate deniers in gulags
  • kill the majority of humans/eradicate 10’s of millions of people
  • enslave the rest
  • wants a green police state
  • forcible sterilization
  • cars confiscated
  • travel restricted to the elite (obviously this asshole thinks he is one of them)
  • forced abortions
  • licenses for birth
  • tight regulation of electric power
  • forcing humans to have arat du jour diet
  • terminate businesses

Of course none of the above will affect the élite, who he considers himself to be one of. Sounds like a really “nice” guy doesn’t he?

Philosopher Pentti Linkola has built an enthusiastic following of self-described “eco-fascists” receptive to his message that the state should enact draconian measures of “discipline, prohibition, enforcement and oppression” in order to make people comply with environmental dictates.

Linkola’s barbaric and dictatorial philosophy has remained relatively obscure but is now gaining traction as the mask of environmentalism is lifted to unveil its true nature – a justification for 21st century tyranny on a grand scale, characterized by eugenics, sterilization, gulags, police states, and total government control over every aspect of our existence.

I don’t think Adolph Hitler or Joseph Stalin were even this ambitious. Either might have hired him. It doesn’t stop with him, though.  There are other’s running about like him. Who else?

Turns out that we also have our own advocate of mass genocide right here in the United States. Where? Right in the Whitehouse, that’s where!

The current White House science czar John P. Holdren also advocates the most obscenely dictatorial, eco-fascist, and inhumane practices in the name of environmentalism. In his 1977 Ecoscience textbook, Holdren calls for a “planetary regime” to carry out forced abortions and mandatory sterilization procedures, as well as drugging the water supply, in an effort to cull the human surplus.

Must be some of that hope and change all the libtard lemmings voted for. Yes, our president is such a nice guy he hires a Malthusian moron and puts him our government as a White House Czar. That should tell you all you need to know about Obama.  A sitting president shouldn’t be socializing or employing people like this. Hell, a normal human being wouldn’t associate with Holdren or Linkola. Yet the chosen one gets away with it and gets accolades to boot. You can read more about Holdren and his shenanigans here in this article at The Resilient Earth.

I would offer the Doctor Kevorkian of climate change and his buddies a suggestion. Why don’t you back up your bullshit and all kill yourselves as you’re all a part of the problem. Perhaps you should set an example for the rest of us? I doubt many will want to follow, including yourselves and your “people.” After all, stuff like this is only acceptable when it applies to other people isn’t it?

If you don’t have the balls to do that then perhaps you should start eating “Rat – it’s whats for dinner” or “Rat – the other white meat.”

This is what I’d term to be Mega CO2 Insanity. You can read all about this asshole at the source link below.

Source: Prison Planet

Comments Off on Meet the Dr. Kervorkian of Climate Change

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming, Government, Terrorist

Help save an Aussie farm family & stop green tyranny!

Help these people the have kids and dreams like the rest of us!

VERY URGENT! PLEASE READ! PLEASE HELP WITH A DONATION!

From the Watts Up With That? website comes an urgent call to help save an Aussie farm family who have been screwed-over by the greentards and the Australian government. I would take donating up to another level and send the government e-mails explaining to them that you will not be spending any tourist dollars in Australia until crap like this stops. I’m making a PayPal donation and when I find some greentard government officials to e-mail, I will be sending them some terse comments.  Thanks for helping stop the greentard tyrrany!  This is urgent they only have 4 days until they’re evicted. Please help!

WUWT readers may recall this story: Death of a Feedlot Operator

In which the anal-retentive government of West Australia has “licensed” a family farm out of operation due to some phony science and arbitrary application of the “sniff test”. Yes that’s right, cattle farms smell, so do pig farms, as does any farm. But now it’s reason to shut one out due to baseless complaints from the local greens. And, it all started when Matt Thompson started doubting global warming and talking about it publicly.

I’ve never made a plea to the WUWT worldwide readership for help, I’m making one now to donate to these people to stave off eviction. If nothing else, do it to spite the government of Western Australia and the greens (Environmental Defender’s Office WA)  that have turned farming into a “crime”. The real crime is that government listens to these boneheads.

Source: Watts Up With That?

Link to article from JoNova website: http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/4-days-notice-the-thompsons-are-served-notice-of-eviction/

I would urge anyone with a website and a heart to post this up as fast as  you can. You could be the next victim of greentardism. Now I’m off to make a donation!

2 Comments

Filed under Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming, Government

“The Weather of the Future” Alarmist Book Review

This one makes me laugh. We now have a book titled “The Weather of the Future.” Picked up from the Washington Post review Page titled “Science Scan,” which in the case of some “warmer” scientist might be more accurately named “Science Scam.”

Based upon what their writeup on “The Weather of the Future” book it appears we may have yet another case of climate models being used meaning we might also have another case of prophecy by science.

I’ll wager that Nostradamus probably isn’t spinning in his grave worrying about the accuracy factor.  You know those crazy computer models.  Figure out the result you want then plug-in the data to ensure a successful prediction. Then write a  new scary book about how global warming is going to fricassee everyone.

I do find one line from the review probably best describes what this obvious attempt to get everyone to go “postal” over global warming is all about.

Cullen even foresees Xavier, a Category 4 hurricane, slamming into New York City in 2050. No climate model, no matter how sophisticated, could predict a hurricane that far in advance, so clearly Cullen is taking some creative license to make a point.

That’s pretty good premonition (or as I prefer to term it “bullshit”) to be seeing into mid-century, which is 40 years from now.  But I do think the reviewer has it right when she notes “creative license,” (another euphemism for “bullshit”). I mean she even named it! Looks like Jean Dixon might have some competition.

With all the alarmism of late giving us results like James J. Lee’s Ecoterror Jihad against the Discovery Channel HQ, one has to start to wonder what other ecoterror crimes the recent wave of “Alarmist Whackjonism” may cause.

There is one thing the author of the review didn’t tell us that “enquiring minds” may want to know want to know. Will this be filed in the “science” section at the library or the “fiction” section?

You can see Heidi Cullen in action in the below video from YouTube of the Larry King show to see her in action. This is in 2007 just before the IPCC released its last report.

Dr. Cullen also seems like perhaps she has a little NAZI in her blood as evidenced by her quote below, taken from the Weather Channel 12/21/06 (here), that I feel is tantamount to advocating that the opposition be not only silenced but punished,  if they dare disagree with anthropogenic global warming.

If a meteorologist can’t speak to the fundamental science of climate change, then maybe the AMS shouldn’t give them a Seal of Approval.

What next Heidi, perhaps advocating they go to a “gulag” for “re-education?”

You can decide what you think about Dr. Cullen and her book yourself.

Source: Science Scan/Washington Post

Comments Off on “The Weather of the Future” Alarmist Book Review

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Eco Jihad, Ecoterror, Global Warming, Weather

Alarmist Whackjobism Continues?

Per info in the article this cut in the Amazon rainforest will be replaced 50 times by new growth

We have a new study that appears to be another instance of  what I call “alarmist whackjobism.” It only bolsters my impression that the “warmers” are in desperation mode and are posting some rather amazing things. Things that have the appearance of being designed to bolster their failing arguments regarding anthropogenic global warming. Things designed perhaps to give the governments of the world motivation to pass carbon taxes, cap-and-trade laws and reign in all things that emit carbon. Things that could potentially create a new Unibomber or a new James J. Lee. This time it’s about the tropical rainforests (again).

Allheadlinenews.com has this article titled “New Farmlands Driving Out Forests Causes Climate Change Study Says.” It cites what is in my opinion an alarmist study (citation here) posted on the PNAS website (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America) that “conveniently” points out that those nefarious tropical farmers are cutting down those trees (the warmers so love to hug) by the millions, and that the process is (of course), going to increase CO2 (which we’re still supposed to believe increases global warming in spite of much damning evidence to the contrary). You can take the following statement into consideration.

More than half a million square miles of new farmland created in tropical countries, such as Brazil and Indonesia, between 1980 to 2000 was due to the felling of forests which in turn, accelerated the release of carbon into the atmosphere resulting in global warming, according to a new study led by Stanford postdoctoral researcher, Holly Gibbs, of the Department of Environmental Earth System Science.

Go ahead, read it again, look at the dates: “between 1980 to 2000.” That seems to be a “conveniently” dated report. Possibly “conveniently” dated because there’s nothing going on after 2000 to get excited about. You call it, I’m just pointing it out for you to think about.

The abstract at PNAS makes me wonder if there wasn’t some “convenient” timing there?  If you read the fine print you can see this study was submitted on September 22, 2009 and not approved until July 30, 2010. That’s a little over 10 months and a lot of negative things about global warming have happened since 9/22/09 such as Climategate, the IPCC getting sat on by the IAC, the Hockeystick graph, myriad problems with the MET, NOAA, NASA, GISS, Satellitegate and many other issues that appear to have increased the warmer desperation level faster than NOAA or GISS can alter temperature data.

I almost wonder if this wasn’t pulled out of the round file due to the increasing need to counter-attack the skeptics with anything they can muster. Like the saying goes “desperate times call for desperate measures,” which could be the new “warmer” mantra.

Why do I take umbrage at this? First, let us look at the definition of umbrage, which is why I chose that word as it seems to have a good take on the “warmer” claims made in this study about rainforests. From here at Dictionary.com we get the following:

“um·brage

[uhm-brij]  Show IPA

–noun

1. offense; annoyance; displeasure: to feel umbrage at a socialsnub; to give

umbrage to someone; to take umbrage at someone’s rudeness.

2. the slightest indication or vaguest feeling of suspicion, doubt,hostility, or

the like.

3. leaves that afford shade, as the foliage of tree

4. shade or shadows, as cast by trees.

5. a shadowy appearance or semblance of something.”

Sorry if you don’t get it but since we’re talking about rainforests I thought the definitions were funny, and yes, words such as offense; annoyance; and displeasure could describe my feelings about what I question is going on with this report (to say the least).

There is a reason I take umbrage, which takes us back to the date of the report. My suspicion is that they don’t have much to stir people up with after 2000, so they cut things “conveniently” off  at 2000. It appears that after 2000 we have things popping up that present problems with the claims in this report such as:

From Mongabay we get the following about the Amazon Jungle.

Annual deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell below 10,000 square kilometers for the first time since record-keeping began, reported Brazil’s Environment Minister Carlos Minc on Sunday.

You can read the whole article here. Please note that it’s dated June 22, 2009, about 8.5 years after the 2000 cutoff date cited in the study. Also please note the remark at the end about how the Brazilian government committing to significant reductions in deforestation of the Amazon Jungle, which is an indication the deforestation will slow down and possibly stop in much of the Amazon. Something not mentioned this report even though recently published.

Want more to ponder? You can read this from a New York Times article here circa June 29, 2009, again long after this studies cutoff date of 2000.

By one estimate, for every acre of rain forest cut down each year, more than 50 acres of new forest are growing in the tropics on land that was once farmed, logged or ravaged by natural disaster.

The new forests, the scientists argue, could blunt the effects of rain forest destruction by absorbing carbon dioxide, the leading heat-trapping gas linked to global warming, one crucial role that rain forests play.

Well now, isn’t that amazingly contrary to the report that prompted this post? Rainforest’s growing? Heaven forbid! This could be another reason we get the cutoff date of 2000. Again from the same NYT article.

The idea has stirred outrage among environmentalists who believe that vigorous efforts to protect native rain forest should remain a top priority. But the notion has gained currency in mainstream organizations like the Smithsonian Institution and the United Nations, which in 2005 concluded that new forests were “increasing dramatically” and “undervalued” for their environmental benefits. The United Nations is undertaking the first global catalog of the new forests, which vary greatly in their stage of growth.

Even the United Nations (home of the IPPC and who in general seem to love all things warming) bought into the fact that the rainforest are growing back in 2005, about 5 years after the 2000 cutoff date in the Stanford report. Is environmental outrage perhaps some or all of the driving force behind this report? Is this another good reason for the 2000 cutoff date?

We get even more from CO2 Science’s article found here.

In a report published in the 6 March 2009 issue of Science, Oliver L. Phillips of the UK’s University of Leeds and his 65 co-authors write that “old growth forests in Amazonia … through photosynthesis and respiration … process 18 petagrams [18 x 1015 grams] of carbon annually,” which they say is “more than twice the rate of anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions.” They also state that over the past quarter-century of intensive region-wide measurements, the productivity of the Amazon rainforest — even in its extreme old age — has been found to be “increasing with time,” in support of which statement they cite the comprehensive observational studies of Phillips et al. (1998), Nemani et al. (2003), Baker et al. (2004), Lewis et al. (2004) and Ichii et al. (2005).

So per the above the Amazon alone is processing more CO2 than we’re pumping out globally (2 x) and the ability to process CO2 is increasing, not decreasing as the report would have you believe.  This causes me to again wonder why the evident alarmism, what the motivation for this report was and why the seemingly “convenient” cutoff date of 2000? Note that the item from CO2 Science doesn’t even include the respiration of all the other forests and plants of all types worldwide, just the Amazon.

Think about this and tell me where’s the problem and why the alarmism? Is this more CO2 Insanity?

Source: Allheadlines.com

1 Comment

Filed under Climate Alarmism, Co2 Insanity, Ecoterror, Global Warming